Welcome

edit
Hello 123wiki123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing!  Netsnipe   ►  18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous
 

Unblock request

edit
 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
123wiki123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
70.101.196.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jigahurtz". The reason given for Jigahurtz's block is: "sockpuppet of DeathSeeker as per Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/DeathSeeker".


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123wiki123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"Multiple usernames are really only a problem if they are used as a method of troublemaking"

Decline reason:

Please provide evidence that you were not troublemaking. -- ЯEDVERS 21:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

123wiki123 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason I was blocked wasn't for trouble making, it was for tagging my alternate account with the alternate account template, see above for link

Decline reason:

This was a block based on the fact that the alternate account is an account used to evade a block placed on some other account. All of this is concurrent with WP:SOCK and WP:BPRyūlóng (竜龍) 02:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per Wikipedia:Assume Good Faith. After reviewing your case further, I now believe that I had acted a bit hastily in blocking you. You started editing Xbox 360 after the block on DeathSeeker (talk ·  contribs) had already expired for WP:3RR violations using the account Jigahurtz (talk ·  contribs), thus you did not violate Wikipedia:Sock puppetry and I also acknowledge that your recent editing to Xbox 360 do not appear to have been as disruptive as those that resulted in DeathSeeker's earlier blocks. You were also forthright about acknowledging the link between this account and Jigahurtz, though technically, you really should have stated that this is an alternate account of DeathSeeker since that was your original account. As long as you do not resume editing Wikipedia disruptively using both accounts in tandem and you disclose their nature, then I see no reason to block you. I regret any inconvenience caused by my earlier misjudgement.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe   ►  18:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply



Old Nintendo template

edit


pt:Predefinição:Nintendo


Old Halo Template

edit
Halo
Games: Halo: Combat EvolvedHalo 2Halo 3Halo WarsUntitled Halo Project
Other: Halo: Custom EditionI Love BeesMultiplayer gametypes in Halo 2
Novels: The Fall of ReachThe FloodFirst StrikeGhosts of OnyxGraphic Novel
Booklets and extras: Conversations from the UniverseCortana Letters
Music and film: Halo Original SoundtrackHalo 2 Original Soundtrack, Vol 1 & Vol 2Halo (film)
Fictional elements: Halo universeInstallationsForerunnerUNSCCovenantFlood
Characters: Master ChiefCortanaArbiter343 Guilty SparkProphetsGravemindMore...
Machinima: Red vs. BlueFire Team CharlieThe CodexThis Spartan Life

Hex168

edit

Please see the talk page regarding the redirect. Hex168 was a short lived marketing campaign enacted in conjunction with the console's launch. Xbox 360 launch covers all the relevant information on this website, there is no need for a seperate article to replicate said info. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit warring

edit

I have asked Netsnipe to reapply your block, since you are engaged in exactly the same sort of sockpuppetry and 3RR violations that got you into trouble in the first place. Also, I've reported your most recent 3RR violation here. Regards, Nandesuka 23:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

XBox 360

edit

The original editor's edit was perfectly acceptable. Your revert (which you've now stretched into a WP:3RR) was unwarranted. You do not WP:OWN this article. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

3RR

edit

I have reported your latest 3RR violation here. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

User notice: temporary 3RR block

edit

Regarding reversions[2] made on November 27 2006 to Xbox 360

edit
 
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 1 week, considering the fact that you just came off of a 72-hour block. Khoikhoi 06:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:XboxLivePipeline.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:XboxLivePipeline.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECUtalk 23:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:XboxLivePipelineLogo.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:XboxLivePipelineLogo.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECUtalk 23:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:XboxLivePipelineLogo.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:XboxLivePipelineLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:XboxLivePipeline.JPG)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:XboxLivePipeline.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Xenos

edit

Regarding your edits on the Xenos article, it is not appropriate to simply copy-and-paste articles when moving them.

When you moved the content from Xenos into Xenos (disambiguation), you did not preserve the history of the page.

Instead, you should have used the Move function available to you in the tabs at the top of all article pages, and moved the article from Xenos to Xenos (disambiguation). Then, you could have edited the Xenos article with the content of the ATI chip.

Please remember this for future reference. Thanks, 203.158.56.234 08:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:GRIT_boxart.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GRIT_boxart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphim Whipp 14:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply