129.174.182.69

November 2018

Hello, I'm Gilded Snail. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:GENDERID for Wikipedia policy about pronouns. Thank you. Gilded Snail (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Archbishop Carroll High School (Washington, D.C.). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You made an unsourced POV edit, and I undid it. You restored it without discussion and called my edit POV and vandalism. That's a person attack. Now either follow WP:BRD and discuss your edit on the talk page, or leave it alone. Meters (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And you were pointed to WP:BRD in the edit summary one month ago when user:Archer1234 undid your previous claim that the school was a "social justice" institute. You've made the claim three times now. You have a choice. You can leave this alone, you can discuss this on the article's talk page, or you can make the edit again. I would strongly suggest that you read WP:EW before restoring it again, though. And we are not making a WP:POV edit or vandalizing the article by removing your edit. Meters (talk) 00:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Archbishop Carroll High School (Washington, D.C.), you may be blocked from editing. What are you doing? Did you even look at my edits before you undid them? It makes no sense at all to use an non-functional archived copy of an accreditation search page rather than my ref ref which actually shows the current accreditation status. It is incorrect to claim that the school served "young women and men" before the merge. The sources say it was a boys school. There is no mention of multiple mottoes in the existing source or the school's webpage. Your new source is not online so I cannot see what it is you are trying to say, but according to the school it has one motto. If those were the mottoes of the merged schools then it is very confusing (and incorrect) to simply add them to the motto field. I suggest adding them to the history section. Meters (talk) 21:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Archbishop Carroll High School (Washington, D.C.) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been undone multiple times on your claim that this is a "social justice" institution. Stop edit warring and discuss the edit Meters (talk) 21:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Archbishop Carroll High School (Washington, D.C.). Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Don't call my edits vandalism, in edit summaries or on the talk page. Either participate in the discussion or leave the article alone Meters (talk) 22:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020

}}

---