October 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Allie DiMeco, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2010

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phi Gamma Delta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 11:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Transnistria has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Female genital cutting, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

December 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Calculus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 09:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at For Colored Girls. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

June 2011

edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of English monarchs worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fourteen Points, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fourteen Points with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Monty845 16:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lindsey Evans, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

September 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sing for the Moment, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

March 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Smart (automobile), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sandy (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Telfordbuck. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ronnie Ortiz-Magro because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Telfordbuck (talk) 06:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stiltsville. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I plan to add different aspects of the "political structure" spectrum. I'd also like to add the origins of political structures and briefly about their purposes and how their purposes have evolved over the course of time.

April 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Palm Beach Central High School, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Blue Edits (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987 concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Utah Anti Improvisation act of 1987, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Von Neumann

edit

Hello,

Why did you remove references to Von Neumann on P versus NP problem and Kurt Gödel? I cannot think of any good reason, but perhaps you can enlighten others as to your reasoning. Fichid (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Lachielmao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, City Girls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lachielmao (talk) 06:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.