User talk:13akoors

Removal of color coding by Month

It seems that this edit was the date upon which the color coding by month was removed. Before this, each month had a consistent color that made it easy to navigate and find information chronologically. Why was this formatting removed? Piratesyar (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. This formatting was removed for multiple reasons. Firstly, it was done to standardize the table structure used on the page, and to match how the table was used on other "[Year] in video games' pages. Secondly, the formatting change allows for the tables to be sorted by date, using a template that requires a single column.

I also don't agree that the tables are that much less easy to navigate. Yes, color can be nice, but it's pretty easy to see where January ends, and February begins by reading the date. 13akoors (talk) 14:27, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

The new table order is awful, Please return colour ~2026-13771-42 (talk) 09:58, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of role-playing video games: 2024 to 2025 has been accepted

List of role-playing video games: 2024 to 2025, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ A412 ^talk! 02:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your article list of video games released in 2012

are you looking for additional volenteers to help you edit

if you are, im avabile AlwaysBlaze (talk) 15:47, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

@AlwaysBlaze: Absolutely. I'm very slowly working through a lot of these List articles, so if you see anything that you're able to help out on, I'm definitely glad for the assistance 13akoors (talk) 22:33, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi 13akoors. Thank you for your work on List of action role-playing video games. Another editor, CostalCal, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I never knew that you could add a content search to Wikipedia articles! Good article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CostalCal}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CostalCal (talk) 01:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

"2029 in video games" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 2029 in video games has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6 § 2029 in video games until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: Template swap

Just an FYI that your apparent merge of Template:Video game gameplay into Template:Game design is causing you a great deal of unnecessary wasted time and effort. Typically we start merge discussions for that around here and have it done by a bot rather than doing it manually over numerous pages. Note that I'm not necessarily disagreeing with it, but you are not going about it the right way and if people disagree with it, it will be an equally large amount of time and effort to change it back. If you have not replaced every instance of it, I'd recommend stopping the manual swapping and starting a merge discussion immediately. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

@Zxcvbnm: A merge is probably not the right term in this context. It's more that I'm going through every page that uses this template and swapping them with other templates. As far as I'm aware, there is no policies against doing it this way. Additionally, I'm not sure the "right way" you mention would be helpful here, since I've had to swap this template out with about 4 other templates, since it's a weird conglomeration of topics from many other templates, so a direct swap with a bot wouldn't really give the same effect.

All that to say, there is currently only 1 page left that this template is linked to, and then I planned to put it up for deletion anyways. So it's probably moot at this point.

Plus, I do this while video editing, so I'm fine with the completely manual process. 13akoors (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I mean, in that case, the proper thing to do would be to put it up for deletion while it's on as many pages as possible, so people can see the notice. If you specify it be replaced in the AfD, then that aspect can still be done by a bot. Given that there is still the chance that the template will be kept, replacing it now is putting the cart before the horse, so to speak. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)