To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Harmeet Singh Sooden that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Salad, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 20:34, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

October 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meadows, Newfoundland and Labrador, you may be blocked from editing.

November 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Goulds, St. John's, you may be blocked from editing. Mindmatrix 21:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User:Mindmatrix. Favonian (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

142.40.135.244 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Also, one more such request and talk page access will likely be gone too. Huon (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikishovel (talk) 10:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm RSTech1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Meadows, Newfoundland and Labrador— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RSTech1 (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ramea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RSTech1 (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Goulds, St. John's, you may be blocked from editing. RSTech1 (talk) 15:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Goulds, St. John's. RSTech1 (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sudan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KNHaw (talk) 04:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:Favonian may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. KNHaw (talk) 04:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

edit

  Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:Materialscientist can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:45:39 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  – Gilliam (talk) 07:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Paradise, Newfoundland and Labrador— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jim1138. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 08:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:DatGuy. Kleuske (talk) 09:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2002 Britannic Asset Management International Championships – Singles, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 09:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Economy of Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 09:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. 5 albert square (talk) 23:49, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Scorpions13256. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Freddy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Scorpions13256 (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.