144.172.12.14

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sino-Soviet border conflict, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As per the article, please obtain consensus on the talk page prior to changing the infobox "victory" results. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:08, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I added new reference proving that China was indeed victorious.

China retained control of the island and Russia later ceded more land to China.

Sino–Soviet border dispute - Oxford Reference

https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100508460 144.172.12.14 (talk) 05:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Please see my message on the talk page. I do not see a clear consensus on the page indicating that the infobox should say "Chinese victory". Please respond there & point me to where you're seeing this so we can keep this a bit more orderly. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:11, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict, you may be blocked from editing. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sino-Soviet border conflict. Do not change the article again without obtaining consensus on the talk page. There is no clear consensus on the talk page, nor have you attempted to start a discussion there. I've made a post to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history and asked for some neutral, knowledgeable editors to help form a consensus. Your independent research does not overrule the need for consensus. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---