May 2017

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page Manspreading has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 04:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Datbubblegumdoe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Judicial activism in the European Union— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Datbubblegumdoe[talkcontribs] 23:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Hertfordshire— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

McLaren MP4/1

edit

Please stop making that change to McLaren MP4/1. As Pyrope explained in his edit summary, although many other chassis had used carbon fibre in part previously, the MP4 was the first to be fully constructed from carbon fibre. Unless you have a source that says otherwise? DH85868993 (talk) 12:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Looks like you are past blockability. Please discuss. Your version is not supported by sources, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.