August 2014

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Photography and the law. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chocolate Rain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Barry Winchell— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff | Who, me? 14:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 401st Air Support Group (December 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 155.220.248.90, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Super48paul (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

You defeat the Wikipedia mission. Why let anyone edit if all you wiki police do is remove everything. Wikipedia is now a small 1% minority exercising power over the other 99% without authority. This is the last time I will ever use Wikipedia, so your mission is accomplished.

July 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mechanism of action of aspirin— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Disneyland Railroad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toreightyone (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You defeat the Wikipedia mission. Why let anyone edit if all you wiki police do is remove everything. Wikipedia is now a small 1% minority exercising power over the other 99% without authority. This is the last time I will ever use Wikipedia, so your mission is accomplished.

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Spades, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.