160.72.225.209

Procedures

Sorry but Wikipedia is a strange place where certain procedures are followed. Article talk pages provide a place to discuss actionable proposals to improve the article based on Wikipedia's policies. They are not available for generic comments, and particularly are not available for complaints. I have reverted your comment at Talk:Ahmose-Nefertari again and will block this IP if the edit is repeated. If you want an independent opinion on the matter, ask at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Johnuniq (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Can you see this talk page? Please reply to allow discussion. There is no need to discuss the problem with me if you like. As mentioned above, completely independent opinions could be found at WP:Teahouse. Ask "why is my comment diff being reverted?" and see what people think. As I see it, no page at Wikipedia is available for an inflammatory comment unrelated to improvement of articles. If people were free to exchange insults, Wikipedia would quickly degenerate and resemble the many failed forums on the internet. At any rate, repeats will lead to loss of editing privileges. Johnuniq (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/160.72.225.209, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Train of Knowledge (Talk) 23:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing and sock puppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 13:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

• I believe the above block for sock puppetry was in error, sorry about that. I've undone that block and instead blocked you for a week for personal attacks and edit warring at Talk:Ahmose-Nefertari. Bishonen | tålk 18:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is beyond stupid! You blocked me for personal attacks?? Who did I personally attack. First you block me for sock puppetry. Made an idiot of yourself, then you claim I am somebody called "Charles". I guesss, you will resort to any dirty tactic to keep me of wikipedia. But all you are doing is providing me documentary evidence of the farce of wikipedia policy.

---