October 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current events/2016 May 28. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Heaton, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:13, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Bilborough College, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 17:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zonefox (October 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JDoorjam was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JDoorjam JDiscourse 20:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 165.225.80.61! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JDoorjam JDiscourse 20:26, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Continent. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization Talk 14:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or [[Special:UserLogin|logging in

1989

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to 1989 appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply