Regarding edits made during January 26 2007 (UTC) to Great Depression

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Heliac 18:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Joe Frazier. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mr.Z-mantalk 16:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

January 2008

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abraham Lincoln assassination, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abraham Lincoln assassination was changed by 165.234.180.49 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-08T16:35:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Abraham Lincoln assassination, you will be blocked from editing. delldot talk 16:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2008

edit

  Your recent edit to United Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edit to United Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008

edit

  Your recent edit to United Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edit to United Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to United Nations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Your recent edit to United Nations (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2008 Summer Olympics venues, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2008 Summer Olympics venues was changed by 165.234.180.49 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-08-21T16:07:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Kenya worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. Apparition11 (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Falkland Islands. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pfainuk talk 15:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Caen, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Caen was changed by 165.234.180.49 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-02T17:10:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Jardin botanique de Caen has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

April 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Niemann–Pick disease. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please don't be silly

edit

  Please don't monkey about with joke edits, such as your edit to Canned hunt. We try hard here to produce something we can all be proud of, and silliness doesn't help. Articles are monitored, and users messing around could be blocked. Why not try contributing something useful instead? Have a look at the links below and get stuck in properly:

Thanks – and enjoy yourself as a responsible Wikipedian! Denisarona (talk) 15:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Canned hunt with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Wikipelli Talk 16:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mothers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 15:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mothers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sibling, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sibling was changed by 165.234.180.49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963593 on 2011-12-12T15:45:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sibling. Mifter (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Mifter (talk) 15:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Federal Housing Administration, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Federal Housing Administration with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 20:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Marcus Kollman

edit

I am a young, dark male that loves to get down on hot babes. if you would like to contact me call me at 1-701-652-1800.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Federal Housing Administration with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikih101 (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Little Albert experiment, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Abhijay What did I do this time? 14:47, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Brown (novelist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

June 2012

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. O.Koslowski (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Apache, you may be blocked from editing. Dger (talk) 21:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Glaisher. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mark Andrews (filmmaker) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Glaisher [talk] 17:29, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Queenie (novel) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 19:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits to Kieran Bergin

edit

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kieran Bergin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Métis  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 18:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ho Chi Minh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Sideways713 (talk) 19:32, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.