User talk:16912 Rhiannon/LegalShield
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 16912 Rhiannon in topic needs work
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
.
needs work
editThanks for asking for help before posting.
You have too much WP:OR and have too many WP:PRIMARY sources. Please read through WP:RS, particularly WP:SECONDARY.
You can {{ping}} me when you have taken all the WP:PRIMARY stuff out. I know it will probably reduce the article substantially, but that's how things work here. We're not here to promote companies. --David Tornheim (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- @David Tornheim: Thanks for reviewing and sharing your feedback! In the draft, I'm just using one company source to confirm leadership details. Can you clarify which sources you think are problematic? 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just a quick nudge @David Tornheim: -- can you clarify which sources you were referring to? 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dear @16912 Rhiannon: I will take a look at the sandbox article. I will do some edits as needed. By the way, thank you for reaching out and disclosing your COI. I do appreciate that. Geraldshields11 (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dear @16912 Rhiannon: I did some editing and will likely do some more. I tried to find a new cite to the 2016 memberships but could not. I did find a cite to the 2014 memberships in Bloomberg. Please take a look at the changes, please find a cite to the 2016 numbers (footnote 6), and please comment here. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Geraldshields11, thanks for taking a look at the draft and the edits to it so far! Just to clarify are you looking for a new cite to replace the Marketwatch piece? The user/membership number is noted under the LegalShield heading in that piece: "For its 1.6 million users, landlord-tenant disputes comprise 8.7% of user cases, estate planning and traffic disputes each comprise 7% of LegalShield cases." If a new citation is preferred, this piece from The Journal Record also confirms 1.6 million members. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 12:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- The Journal Record seems to be more of a third-party cite. So, the Journal Record is what I was thinking about. Geraldshields11 (talk) 13:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Geraldshields11, thanks for taking a look at the draft and the edits to it so far! Just to clarify are you looking for a new cite to replace the Marketwatch piece? The user/membership number is noted under the LegalShield heading in that piece: "For its 1.6 million users, landlord-tenant disputes comprise 8.7% of user cases, estate planning and traffic disputes each comprise 7% of LegalShield cases." If a new citation is preferred, this piece from The Journal Record also confirms 1.6 million members. Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 12:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dear @16912 Rhiannon: I did some editing and will likely do some more. I tried to find a new cite to the 2016 memberships but could not. I did find a cite to the 2014 memberships in Bloomberg. Please take a look at the changes, please find a cite to the 2016 numbers (footnote 6), and please comment here. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Dear @16912 Rhiannon: I will take a look at the sandbox article. I will do some edits as needed. By the way, thank you for reaching out and disclosing your COI. I do appreciate that. Geraldshields11 (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
- Just a quick nudge @David Tornheim: -- can you clarify which sources you were referring to? 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Ok! I've updated the memberships details in the Business model and Rankings and recognition section. Anything else you'd like me to look at again? 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 14:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)