Removing speedy deletion tags

edit

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags, as with your recent edits to Thomas A. Schramm, without discussing the removal first on the article's talk page - I flagged the page as a csd-bio (it is also a copyvio of http://www.awareness-group.com/esc2007/biogs.html - and would like the page to be reviewed and decided upon by an administrator. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 10:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

As your IP address resolves to Accenture, it's probably also appropriate to point you in the direction of the Wikipedia guidelines on conflicts of interest. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 10:29, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Niels Bohr, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Arjuna. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 220 of Borg 09:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference Errors on 29 April

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bookmyshow because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Onel5969 (talk) 13:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.