January 2011

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Umbra, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  The recent edit you made to Umbra constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 22:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Berlin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carnivorous plant with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gas giant, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gas giant was changed by 198.237.49.200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963961 on 2013-05-01T17:25:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Winner 42. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Testing cosmetics on animals— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Winner 42 Talk to me! 18:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1993 Storm of the Century has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:50, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1993 Storm of the Century with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dust storm with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1993 Storm of the Century. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chesley Sullenberger, you may be blocked from editing. You're fooling no one. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to History of Chinese currency— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Basil have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sybil Ludington has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Trebuchet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Trebuchet was changed by 198.237.49.200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949387 on 2017-10-30T21:55:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Trebuchet. CityOfSilver 22:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Crater+Lake, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. McFar54 22:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crater+Lake. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McFar54 22:04, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Crater+Lake. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. McFar54 22:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Crater+Lake. McFar54 22:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Crater+Lake, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McFar54 22:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:DytranA

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:DytranA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PrussianOwl (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of rivers of Belgium have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Sistine Chapel. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:15, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Willful distortion

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Willful distortion, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply