1zstone
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Business interruption insurance . Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dynamic Self-Syndication ™ (DSS ™)
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Dynamic Self-Syndication ™ (DSS ™), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 22:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard J. Arsenault has been accepted
editYou are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:06, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Richard J. Arsenault un-accepted
editAn article you recently created, Richard J. Arsenault, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bri, I am not able to review the Richard J. Arsenault as it looks like was it was deleted for some reason. Any idea where this content is living now? 1zstone (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- You can discuss with the administrator who deleted it (I am not an admin). Procedures are outlined at WP:Undelete.
- Thanks! Sorry for the confusion 1zstone (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- By the way why did you delete your COI declaration? ☆ Bri (talk) 22:34, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- I did after I saw it had been deleted because I saw that you had said it was formatted improperly but I think I figured it out and resubmitted for properly on my profile. 1zstone (talk) 00:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Progress Corticon Logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:Progress Corticon Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Progress Ipswitch MOVEit logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:Progress Ipswitch MOVEit logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)