2001:44C8:4748:D7DE:B011:7D5F:B7C6:2F7F

October 2022

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Larry Hockett. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Rosiestep, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No. 2001:44C8:4748:D7DE:B011:7D5F:B7C6:2F7F (talk) 20:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Della Campbell MacLeod. ARoseWolf 20:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your level 4 vandalism warning at User talk:205.134.209.8 was not justified. The IP had made an unsourced edit, so it would have been justifiable to revert the edit and give a level 1 or 2 warning of the unsourced edit, but you need to understand what is vandalism and what is not, and you need to understand where it is justifiable to give a level 4 warning. You had been warned above, but have continued with the same behaviour. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Your level 4 warning at User talk:86.126.198.25 was also unjustified, and your revert at Minister of State for Development was clearly erroneous. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Take a break from disruptive editing: providing no reason for reversions; falsely accusing other users of vandalism. During the next day or so, consider whether you wish to edit in a constructive and helpful way. If you don't, then please don't return. -- Hoary (talk) 03:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

---