2001:8003:5022:5E01:9979:3345:83BB:CBFD

Procedures

I have tried to explain at WP:COIN that an actual problem needs to be identified. At the moment, the actual problem is that you are importing an off-wiki battle to Wikipedia. We see dozens of cases like that every month and the result is always the same—the party who is causing disruption is blocked. There are also dozens of shifting IPs who imagine they can't be blocked, but that is not correct. You have not identified any text in an article that is a problem and you have not found any support. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse but administrative noticeboards are places where administrative decisions are made and I have reverted your unarchiving at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Johnuniq: I did identify the problem and you have not checked it out. On the 3RR edit I put that you removed I gave proof of this coming to Wikipedia's attention previously. This has nothing to do with offsite activity. This has to do with Ylevental editing against COI rules (and NPOV as well for the record). The previous issue is here. I strongly recommend that you read it and realise who the real problem is here, and it's not me. Blocking me allows Ylevental to persist with his illegal (under WP rules) conduct, and also allows him to get away with not telling the truth about me. He does not know me. The 3RR report was wrong and I maintain my objection to that result. I request a full and proper investigation by another party as you have chosen to side with the wrong person instead of being neutral as a good admin should. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:9979:3345:83BB:CBFD (talk) 02:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

That is from March 2016—four years ago and ancient history as far as Wikipedia is concerned. If the editor is the serious problem you appear to believe, it should be easy to find some diffs of edits within the last six months that demonstrate a problem. Is there any text in articles edited by the user that is a problem (if so, identify it with an explanation)? I repeat: an actual problem needs to be identified, and importing off-wiki battles will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. When the current block expires, try asking at WP:Teahouse whether my comments misrepresent Wikipedian reality. Johnuniq (talk) 02:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

@Johnuniq: The articles he created that I identified on the COI/N represent a continuation of the behaviour identified in 2016. In other words - he hasn't changed. That is my point. It is the creation of the articles that is the issue within the last four months (ie since I started editing here). Are you saying that I have to identify the content of those articles that is COI only, and the creation is totally irrelevant? And again - there is NO import of off Wiki conduct. I ask that this accusation be withdrawn as wrong. I don't even know what he's done off Wiki and I don't care either because that's not relevant. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:9979:3345:83BB:CBFD (talk) 03:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay - pretty clear I'm not going to get a reply here so I'll wait until this block finishes and then make a formal complaint. See you in April. 2001:8003:5022:5E01:9979:3345:83BB:CBFD (talk) 09:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

---