January 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm BethNaught. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Main Page because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! BethNaught (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

.

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.86.135.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talk:Three Kingdoms— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 12:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to User talk:I dream of horses, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 09:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ifurstupid-sumadvaisSHUTUPnnb.maitnot=!!nowgof.urslfw/urgarbag

  Hello, I'm Secret Agent Julio. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fencing response because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SAJ (T) 11:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lucky Number (album) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Jolin Tsai with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.86.135.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 12:11, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Main Page seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 10:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

202.86.135.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

abusivblokbydisabld8insoryxkusofanadmin--american[inst.ofus=signofidiocy,damoro/INTLsite,omnlydumppl.dungetdad!!!!!!

Decline reason:

If you wish your site ban to be reviewed or reconsidered, the instructions are at Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Appeals_and_discussions. Evading the ban by editing as an IP will not help your case. Yunshui  13:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

néditpriv???shovuravbusivlingoupurf.disabld8inases!!!kalindaefetnswetofodráprivil,umindboglindumabusivdusigustinlot!!!!!

butydunuDISABLD8INRAS=TASHOLDUNUTEIKURDISGUSTINrait0leavNDISAPEARFOREVA,RENDRINDAWORLDASERV=?????INCREDIBLYST.INANDULKALESPPL=WP/WM,JEZ!!!