May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nair Service Society without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sitush (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Phaneesh Murthy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

June 2013

edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Nair Service Society, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Vitaly Milonov has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Delta Goodrem constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nair Service Society. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nair Service Society. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nair Service Society, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 23:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nair Service Society. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Auric talk 17:54, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nair Service Society. Dl2000 (talk) 00:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Nair Service Society. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Auric talk 16:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  GedUK  11:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to KnockoutJS because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya (Hello!) 15:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2014

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rob Elvins. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mozzarella— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Anglican Diocese of Ballarat has been reverted.
Your edit here to Anglican Diocese of Ballarat was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/ballaratanglicancathedral) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.