Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/How to make new HAIR to grow on scalp. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Topher385 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Flip-flop (electronics) was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the article, the edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 09:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Spoof, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Spoof was changed by 210.212.210.83 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888853 on 2012-01-31T10:13:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012‎

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aditya Engineering College, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ramesh Ramaiah talk 18:40, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Joule–Thomson effect because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 11:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thermal efficiency, you may be blocked from editing. --ChetvornoTALK 05:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Multivibrator, you may be blocked from editing. Kiwuser (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ahana Deol has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rajahmundry has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kharagpur— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kharagpur with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chrisw80 (talk) 06:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Igoldste. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Clinical pharmacy— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ira Goldstein (talk) 06:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Waggie. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to MySQL— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Waggie (talk) 06:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 11:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 06:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)Reply