212.13.112.162

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (212.13.112.162) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aleshenka has been reverted.
Your edit here to Aleshenka was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uwdBdIFrqU) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. RGloucester — ☎ 23:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ukraine civil war

What exactly do you think you are doing? The page was turned into a redirect for a reason. If you have stuff to add, please add it here; Ukrainian War of Independence. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

If anybody needs lessons in politeness, it is you, not me. You messed up formatting big time; I reverted you, as simple as that. Evidently, you are interested in adding stuff about the civil war, which is fine; but the wikipedia article on the topic is [[this one, like I said before. If you wish to add anything, go there, and be my guest. If you attempt to change the redirect once again, you will be reverted. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

I am bloody well aware of editwarring regulations. I have no POV to push here; I came here from recent changes patrol, because your edit looked like classic subtle vandalism. You have since proved that it was not, but please go about this the right way. I agree with your proposed edit, and I can help you implement it, just don't be pigheaded. I've removed the notice I just put here as a sign of good faith. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.  RGloucester — ☎ 21:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Vladimir Drinfeld, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

Hello, I'm Drewmutt. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Meryl Streep seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 04:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Twitter is not a reliable source

See wp:selfpublish and wp:reliable sources Jim1138 (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

---