April 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Age of Enlightenment has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. YOURUSERNAME :  Chat  02:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009

edit

  Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Rick Pitino. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tedder (talk) 03:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Rick Pitino. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. tedder (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Possible vandalism (Warning #1)

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Stargate Universe characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by AVBOT.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.

AVBOT produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been reverted, please make the edit again (open the link and press save), report it and remove this warning. Thank you, AVBOT (talk) 00:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page David Boreanaz has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Susfele (talk) 22:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Boreanaz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Whisky drinker | HJ's sock 22:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hippie, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 02:52, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.