January 2021

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 11:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Is this personal attack/allegation without evidence? 223.197.192.15 (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Dude. There is an open Rfc.... Please don't edit the locations before the Rfc is closed and illegitimate use of sock and meatsock is not allowed Matthew hk (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Which edits are you talking about? 223.197.192.15 (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong. Matthew hk (talk) 12:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

What exactly are you talking about? 219.73.73.107 (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Are you trying to label all IP addresses in Hong Kong as socks? 219.73.73.107 (talk) 12:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cite

edit

Please read the Template:Cite book and learn the parameters. The atlas i cited is primary written in Chinese , and has a "built-in" trans-title. There are a few place name in that atlas are marked in English but does not make that book an English book. Also, the |url= can be completely ignore, it just a mean to prove the book exist. Matthew hk (talk) 12:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

That book was published with the names of roads and streets and the names of buildings in both English and Cantonese/Chinese. 223.197.192.15 (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The book also works as a travel guide, which those sections are purely written in Chinese and lack of English translation. You can use |chapter=zh-hk, en but not |chapter=en (or any en code variants) only. Matthew hk (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Matthew hk (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please just read WP:NOTAVOTE and WP:RFC.....All you need to use is leave you "vote" (which actually not) and your rationale at the Rfc section, and admin can count and view all the comments and made a conclusion after 30 days. Matthew hk (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

What? Did I say anything irrelevant? Not a forum? 223.197.192.15 (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
ok if you have new ip address but under the same range, you can move your comment from edit war section to the proper Talk:Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong#RfC: address of the church section. But since your ip is shifted i can't tell how admin would treat this action. And for the thread title, WP:NOTAFORUM, may be my copy and paste is bad. I think i was meant to the guy that discuss i am not Hongkonger enough when living in Australia. Ok, the thread title should be Talk:Holy Trinity Cathedral, Hong Kong Matthew hk (talk) 13:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also, that guy (or group of editors), admin considers they are the same and block two ip ranges 219.76.16.0/20 and 124.217.188.0/23 for a month. Matthew hk (talk) 13:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Lastly, there is another guy in that thread to mention 50 cent which also a typical FORUM behaviour. Hope it is not you to make that comment by ip hopping. Matthew hk (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.