24.144.188.223

Me at the zoo

I can see it with my own eyes that the thumbnail was changed, yes. But we've got a guideline on here about reliable sources, where something should be covered in reliable sources if it were to be included in an article. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 01:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Instead of undoing a helpful edit, you can put work into adding a citation. In this case, it will suffice to use the YT link. What you’re doing is not beneficial for the page. :-) 24.144.188.223 (talk) 14:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignore_all_rules 24.144.188.223 (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

"What you added is correct and I can verify it, but I removed the edit because there isn't a news article about it" - Average Wikipedia user 24.144.188.223 (talk) 14:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hi 24.144.188.223! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Me at the zoo several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Me at the zoo, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

---