24.188.98.118

October 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.188.98.118 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Mere statement that "Donald Trump is widely viewed as a demagogue," when supported by more than 60 WP:Reliable sources verifying the claim that he is indeed, widely viewed as such, does not contravene WP:BLP. This is an encyclopedia, not the cheerleading section. When WP:Reliable sources support a negative claim, there is no violation of policy. More, I did not say Trump is a demagogue; I merely said he is widely viewed as one, which is a fact essentially beyond good-faith dispute.24.188.98.118 (talk) 04:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Sock of User:Kingshowman. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

edit warring

Let's not forget that as a reason for blocking. As I'm sure you know, you may discuss the proposed content on the talk page. Assuming the whole SPI thing gets cleared up. cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

You are correct. I have erred in blocking you per BLP. My apologies. However, you were engaged in an edit war. No call on the SPI. I'll leave the unblock in place and and will see what happens next. Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{unblock|reason= Per [[Jus_ad_bellum]]/[[Just war theory]]. This was a just war. [[Special:Contributions/24.188.98.118|24.188.98.118]] ([[User talk:24.188.98.118#top|talk]]) 04:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)}}

---