24.193.55.210

June 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, List of whistleblowers. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lucy Komisar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lucy Komisar was changed by 24.193.55.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885026 on 2024-07-29T19:21:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lucy Komisar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zingarese talk · contribs (please  mention me on reply; thanks!) 19:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Lucy Komisar) for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Joyous! Noise! 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with... Making corrections on your system is impossible. the Post on my name Lucy Komisar includes defamations. I want to change that. How do i do that without jumping through hoops!!!

1 According to historian Robert O. Self, Komisar was aligned with Betty Friedan <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Friedan> in 1970 in accusing lesbian feminists of threatening to take over NOW, particularly the New York City branch. The dispute led to the dismissal of branch staffers, which, in turn, resulted in a December 1970 press conference in which prominent straight feminists declared their support for lesbian feminists.^[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Komisar#cite_note-2>

This is still defamatory. *Where is the evidence*? Only what the writer said. /A person says something and the evidence is that he said it? !!/ That is not evidence. *Where is the evidence people were fired? They were not fired because there were NO PAID STAFF.* Your entry lies. You need to put my comment where people will see it . Not in someplace else that I cannot event find.

^ AND THIS

2 Eliot Higgins <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Higgins> of the Bellingcat <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellingcat> invesigative journalism group accused Komisar of writing the article with the help of artificial intelligence <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence> and referencing "fictional sources."^[8] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Komisar#cite_note-8> The article was published in the fringe news website /The Grayzone <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grayzone>/, and later removed; Komisar subsequently published a*n amended version.*^[9] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Komisar#cite_note-9>

Grayzone is not “fringe.” It is not legacy corporate media. It is insulting to call it fringe. Means not reliable. It is more reliable than corporate media. It was also published in TheKomisarScoop and is still there. Is that fringe? Because it is not corporate? What is your definition of fringe?

• “Amended version” suggests something significant. All it was was a

change in 5 links. Not in the article itself. Not one word in the article was changed. Your story is still deceptive and defamatory.*

• I challenge you to put this in the main story.*

Lucy Komisar 24.193.55.210 (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

You ask "What is your definition of fringe?" Wikipedia's definition of something being "fringe" is multiple reliable published sources saying that it is fringe, which is the case here. That is given precedence over the personal opinion of an individual person who has a personal reason for preferring that it not be regarded as fringe. JBW (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

---