24.72.40.3

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Patiala. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Patiala, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Patiala, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patiala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Stop making destructive edits to Patiala. Your edits are identified as vandalism. Repeated vandalism is likely to result in you being blocked from editing. Apuldram (talk) 09:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Stop making destructive edits to Patiala. You have been warned about this repeatedly. Your frequent repetition of the same mischievous edit has been identified as vandalism several times before. Future repetition by you is likely to result in loss of editing privileges. Apuldram (talk) 21:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patiala. - Arjayay (talk) 18:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm HickoryOughtShirt?4. I noticed that you recently removed content from Patiala without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 18:57, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

• You have been repeatedly disruptively editing the same article for almost a year now, and have not responded to any request to explain yourself. I have blocked you for 1 year; the block may be lifted if and when you indicate a willingness to explain yourself and discuss with others your editing of Wikipedia. --Jayron32 19:08, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

---