Dennis Brown

edit

@Dennis Brown:I believe you are here to rule. Where to question these? as still am learning

@Dennis Brown: who will look after this page 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

MrOllie

edit

@MrOllie: Don't make false comments like this 'Looks like the IP attempted to falsify such a comment in the archives:'. Study history 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC) 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2022/10 and post answer2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're not fooling anyone, we can see who added text: [1] - MrOllie (talk) 14:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I just copied it from the same page. MelanieN first declined to protect the page. Study the full page or confirm it by asking that user.2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@MelanieN:Your presence is needed here to talk about this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Archive/2022/10#Bharat_Jodo_Yatra 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

331dot

edit

@331dot: I don't have time to study and unblock? 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Then why you are controlling others? 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

just to ask others why this block and protect 2405:201:D01B:60BA:690D:7337:DB82:31A9 (talk) 14:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

@MrOllie and Dennis Brown: Melanie did indeed decline a request related to that page. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've unblocked. They still did not need to be modifying other users comments, particularly in an archive, but that is different than the impression I had, and by itself, I wouldn't have blocked. In the future, don't modify archives or move poeple's comments around like that, as that is not only against policy, but can lead to confusion, like this. Dennis Brown - 16:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Dennis. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply