User talk:24 hours a minute/Archive 1

Please do not modify this talk page. If wishing to start a new discussion go here, thanks.

December 2013

Hello, I am Z. Patterson. I wanted to inform you that I reverted at least one of your recent edits to Coldplay, because it (or they) did not appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Daniel Majstorović has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Daniel Majstorović was changed by 24 hours a minute (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870051 on 2013-12-15T02:28:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kenny Dalglish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kenny Dalglish was changed by 24 hours a minute (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878624 on 2013-12-15T02:34:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Everton F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Please be aware that registered accounts are at a higher risk of being indefinitely blocked than unregistered accounts. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

OK sorry. 24 hours a minute (talk) 02:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

I accept your apology. Z. Patterson (talk) 02:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mareva Galanter. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at White Hart Lane, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A high proportion of your edits involve reverting the contributions of others, and in most cases your explanations do not stand up to scrutiny. In this case you removed from the White Hart Lane article a note about KSS Design also having worked on Stamford Bridge; your edit summary was "don't be absurd, Stamford Bridge has been around for years". However, the article Stamford Bridge (stadium)#Crisis notes that "KSS Design Group (architects) designed the complete redevelopment of Stamford Bridge Stadium and its hotels, megastore, offices and residential buildings" ... and that fact is referenced to KSS's own website. See http://www.kssgroup.com/projects/stamford-bridge.php
You could very easily have checked this yourself.
You are a new editor, and Wikipedia wants to help and encourage new editors ... but none of your contributions appear to be constructive, and most of them seem to consist of removing valid content. If you are genuinely here to improve wikipedia, then you must start improving the quality of your edits, otherwise you will be blocked. You may wish to seek assistance from a mentor: see Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kamelia, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Kamelia was changed by 24 hours a minute (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968029 on 2013-12-15T15:29:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)