2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C

April 2022

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nicholas Rasmussen, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 00:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Nada Bakos has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. You cited the New York post, which on Wikipedia is considered unreliable and should not be used for information about a living person. For detailed explanations see WP:GUNREL and WP:NYPOST Blue Riband► 02:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please note, the New York Post is not considered a reliable source of information. You can see the results of consensus at WP:NYPOST. _signed, Willondon (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a reliable source and should be erased in total. 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 03:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. You've been told. Consensus at Wikipedia does not consider New York Post to be a reliable source. _signed, Willondon (talk) 03:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Please note that Newsweek also has reliability issues at Wikipedia (see WP:NEWSWEEK). Material from opinion columns is not vouched for as news by the publication, and is not a reliable source for information. _signed, Willondon (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Information that you do not like from a certain source does not make the information false, it makes you mentally ill. 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

I suppose you think that Jonathan Turley is a kook too!?!? 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 05:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

How can NPR be on your Green list?!?!? They conspire through both commission and omission, recently completely making up a fake story about masks and Judge Kavenaugh. It must be on your green list so you can include fake information on your Yukipedia?!!?! 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

I don't have a green list. Wikipedia is crowd-sourced and consensus driven. At WP:RSPS are the conclusions that debate has arrived at. There are a number of forums where the reliability of sources is discussed. You can participate there, but continuing to make edits that go against the current consensus isn't going to improve things for you.

I don't have a Wikipedia, either. Again, the force of consensus determines what goes in the articles, not me. I couldn't tell whether "Yukipedia" meant "yucky" as in distasteful or "yuck, yuck" as in it's a joke, or meant something else altogether. I did sense it meant something bad, though. (When we made jambalaya for dinner, my daughter used to call it "yuckalaya", and I'm pretty sure she didn't mean it was a joke.) So I wonder why you are spending your time trying to improve a lost cause that should be (as you said above) erased in total. That's a rhetorical question. You don't need to answer it. _signed, Willondon (talk) 06:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

NO NEWSWEEK IS GREEN IN YOUR APPROVED SOURCES< You have a problem with the truth!!!!

Take another look at WP:NEWSWEEK. The green is for Newsweek prior to 2013. Changes since then mean that the reliability is questionable. Something from an opinion column is definitely not a reliable source. (That's true of any publication. It means the publication is not vouching for it as news.) _signed, Willondon (talk) 05:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

All I need to do is find another source, but I am not going to buy a subscription from a newspaper that files stories about how wonderful life is in the Soviet Union is while millions are being executed, sent to gulags and both intentionally starved to death and incompetently starved to death. 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 05:32, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

It doesn't make the information you don't like false. 2600:1700:3AE0:8180:75E9:69BB:5776:276C (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

---