2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 04:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for your contributions! Here's a cup of coffee. Cheers! Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 08:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sheet phantom— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:28, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Oshwah, did you actually look at what I removed? :) 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

WHOOPS! I just realized that you were fixing the vandalism, not creating it. I apologize for the confusion; I've restored the article to it's proper revision and I appreciate your time fixing the vandalism and for letting me know that I messed up :-). If you need anything else or have further concerns, please don't hesitate to respond here and ping me (just like you did above), or message me on my talk page here. Cheers, and thanks again! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

OK, no problem! :) 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 06:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Punisher

An article like the Punisher wouldn't have a source named Italian Americans: The History and Culture of a People if it wasn't relevant. Just saying.★Trekker (talk) 13:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Fair enough! 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Keoghtom— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:05, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Keoghtom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Shellwood can you please explain to me how my edit is vandalism? 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Keoghtom, you may be blocked from editing. MusicalKnight (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

MusicalKnight can you please explain to me how my edit is vandalism? Wtmitchell and Shellwood didn't bother. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, why were you changing the text from "Keoghtom", to "Keogtom"? Things like that can look like vandalism sometimes. If it's not, I apologize as I'm new here. MusicalKnight (talk) 02:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. I fixed the spelling this time, did not realize that was happening. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

No problem! Remember to be careful, don't want a good faith editor to get blocked. :) MusicalKnight (talk) 02:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Black Cat (comics). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:23, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Oshwah, I was reverting vandalism. Please review the edit history. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Ah, I see what happened. My apologies; I've restored your reversion and I appreciate the heads up and for letting me know what happened :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

No problem! Thank you for that. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 11:28, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Of course; it was the least I could do for you (and honestly what should be expected of others when questioned about edits they made). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:30, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm Dark-World25. I noticed that in this edit to Mister Sinister, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dark-World25 (talk) 02:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

I did leave an edit summary. This was a trivial reference, and not an actual appearance of the character. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 02:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Whoops sorry, it was flagged as possible vandalism and I wasn't sure why you deleted it. Also on your recent revert on Deadpool was flagged as well, and I'm not sure why you would revert correct information to incorrect ones (mutant=>mutate, etc) Dark-World25 (talk) 02:13, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ramonda (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramonda (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramonda (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TTN (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

---