January 12 Current events

edit

Regarding your edit, should we start an article "International response to so-called shithole comments"? The upset caused is real - besides: the Panama bit is unrelated. Wakari07 (talk) 11:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

You're writing in edit summary today on someone else's user talk page: "sorry but my understanding is you can archive what you have read but YOU CANNOT ERASE" Just wanted to tell you I'm trying to understand your thinking. Wakari07 (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Wakari07: This is the same person who edit warred with other editors in the past over news content rather than talking. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk please

edit

Did you read the first "See also" in the WP:OWNTALK article? I'm writing it again for you: Wikipedia:Don't lose the thread. Just so you may understand I'm human. I think you're no more than a pseudo-random bunch of numbers and letters. An algorithm, and not a nice one. Wakari07 (talk) 14:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Current events

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Murchison-Eye (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notice of discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boomer VialBe ready to fight the horde!Contribs 02:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:59, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

3RR

edit

this, this and this added up is WP:3RR. Wakari07 (talk) 13:48, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

4RR

edit

Congratulations! You just reached 4RR... what's wrong? Wakari07 (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 06:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 16:36, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
@Neil: - I don't understand my block, the guy is CLEARLY a permanently banned user using a rotating ip address every three days - all you have done is hurt me, the guy trying to protect wiki, he is already on to his next rotation ip sock - me, this "IS" my ip address - and I hold it sacred as part of my good name in attempting to protect wiki - how does this make sense?--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/95.134.120.212

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/37.54.2.79

are just examples of the last week--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 16:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Instead of edit warring, present your case at WP:ANI with evidence showing block evasion or sustained disruptive editing. --NeilN talk to me 16:50, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Neil: I have been telling you the same thing for over 2 years - what do I present over at wp:ani - HE IS USING A NEW IP ADDRESS EVERY FEW DAYS - block one and 1 minute later he is on the next new one - while for me, on the otherhand, changing my ip address would be proof I had ill-intent to wiki--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 16:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
I'm not getting your pings because you're getting my username wrong. People can use dynamic IPs. You need to show the person using these IPs is either block evading or disruptively editing. --NeilN talk to me 16:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@NeilN: - to be clear if he changes his ip address RIGHT NOW and posts anything other than on his last ip address's talk page he is in evading correct?--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes. --NeilN talk to me 17:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@NeilN: - one minute after my block and his ...

to refresh your memory from above again I state that

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/217.30.192.236

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/95.134.120.212

and now ... since ...

this edit was made just 20 minutes after you gave me a block and you gave the SOCKPUPPET A BLOCK!

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Men%27s_European_Water_Polo_Championship_Qualifiers&diff=prev&oldid=828607507

that edit and a HUNDRED MORE in violation of your block

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/217.30.192.236

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/217.30.192.236

great now lets see how fare you are - ONE remove my block - TWO remove all of these bogus block notices from talk page - ALL OF THEM! each and every notice on my talk page is either from or about a sockpuppet or an administrator assisting a sockpuppet! - THREE assist me in the future with these sockpuppets -

Why do I make those 3 statements - because ONE according to wiki's own rules, a permanently banned user can be reverted without any notice, discussion = there can be no war! - they were never again supposed to be posting edits on wiki! - TWO - according to wiki's own rules ANYONE who assists a sockpuppet of a permanently banned user is also violating wiki's own rules!--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 07:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Drmies, does the above make any sense to you? --NeilN talk to me 07:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@NeilN: - five years I have been fighting against socks and all I get are bans by admins that are either complicit with the socks or my guess sockpuppet masters themselves!--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 08:34, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
@NeilN: - I just proved above that 217.30.192.236 this is the same guy who continues to post while under ban and yet no indefinite ban!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/217.30.192.236

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/217.30.192.236

meanwhile the hunter of socks ME still sits here with a 60 hour ban!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@NeilN: - he just keeps posting and posting and posting --2600:8800:FF0E:1200:C57:B925:112F:96D (talk) 21:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Content dispute for the Portal talk:Current events/2018 March 6 article. Nil Einne (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm SounderBruce. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SounderBruce 21:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

FIU bridge collapse

edit

Just because you can find sources that state that a bystander thinks the bridge fell because a blue cable fell on a blue box doesn't mean it should be included. We don't report hearsay or guesses. The falling cable may have involved a cause or an effect, or nothing at all, and we have no business speculating or reporting speculation. If you ahve anything further to add in this department use the talkpage first - there's a discussion started there. Acroterion (talk) 00:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply