August 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

You made your points loud and clear, and I'll do the same! I hope you read my explanation as to WHY I removed content! Sometimes, I think Wikipedia has confusing and even RIDICULOUS ideas on what they consider "vandalism!" 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Leah. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Inappropriate" external links don't exist, unless they're irrelevant to the topic itself! Sometimes, information isn't always accurate! 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Islamic dietary laws. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Drmies (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don't you know that sometimes, the information itself needs to be updated, no matter WHAT it is? That's NOT "vandalism!" It's the 21st Century, and everything's changed, and it's NOT easy trying to keep up! 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I didn't "vandalize," the Islamic dietary laws article, I updated it! There's a difference! 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Sarah. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Materialscientist (talk) 01:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

You need to take a closer look at what you consider "spam!" 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
For your information, I was helping, NOT vandalizing! I don't even OWN my own website! I ALWAYS had good intentions, but it's sad and unfortunate that Wikipedia doesn't see it that way! 2600:8805:9017:EE00:88EC:9B8C:E3D4:F8F9 (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply