2601:147:C002:D83A:9119:D26F:59A4:1D1D

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Ladysmith Black Mambazo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The sentences you were disputed were clearly missing verbs Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The previous comments on Ladysmith Black Mambo were racist, ethnocentric and did not present a world wide view. I stand by my comments and I know that the person calling it disruptive to point out that the person was a racist will quickly get booed. It is easy to correct grammer mistakes. It is only a racist who comments to other people and bad mouths them for not speaking enlgish as a second language well. Those comments were hate speech and should be filtered out. No one should be called disruptive for calling out racism and hate speech. Please keep your hateful edits to yourself as you clearly support racism. There is nothing disruptive in pointing out that racist comments do not belong on Wikipedia.

Here is a little history for you to learn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_orthography. There is no such thing as "proper english," it is simply something white racists like to say. African Americans understand ebonics and other language variances are normal. Had you studied languages as I have, then you would know the other person and now you are guilty of racist and uneducated remarks. I look forward to your apology if you have the courage to ask a liguist or an African American. I will send you $100 if you post a video. Your mission should you choose to be an honest, educated and caring person is to interview ten linguists, or ten people who have studied languages at a post graduate level (try stepping foot in your local college), ten Mexican Americans and ten Africans, and ten African Americans. If these people agree with you that you are not defending hate speech, then I will send you the money. It is correct that people "disrupt" hate speech when they see it, and you should be ashamed for defeinding it.

---