2601:14D:8701:9E40:D4D7:6ECE:8BF5:CD6

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ezhava. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop removing sourced and relevant content from Ezhava. Nobody's "defaming" anybody. Bishonen | tålk 22:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Please refrain from reverting reverted edits or readding information from reverted edits without finishing the discussion on the subject as you did on the Kalaripayattu page. Your reverting without completing the discussion is bordering on edit warring. This is your final warning. If you revert one more time without finishing the content discussion, you will be in direct violation of WP:3RR and will be considered to be edit warring. Let's have a civil discussion about this, either on my talk page (as you're already doing), or on the talk page of the Kalaripayattu article. Kalariwarrior (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

---