September 2024

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:34CA:87CE:F550:B1EE (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

After reviewing the reasons stated for a one month block and reviewing the WP pages on disruptive edits, the stated reason by admin @ScottishFinnishRadish, I believe I did not violate Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. My recent contributions have been thoughtful and without using curse words or pejorative language. I tried to obtain consensus on two TPs and posted two RfCs, one if which has gathered plenty positive votes, including from admins. One particular experienced editor has casted aspersion on me, posted abouy me on the ANI and when an involved admin sided with me, this person went to the Admins TP to further complain. I was then told by this admin to drop it and they told the complaining editor the same. I dropped and have not replied again to this offending editor yet I am being blocked. I believe, but I could be wrong, that this editor forum shopped for another admin and probably only showed partial comments, to be awarded a block of me as an IP editor. Moreover, if my RfCs and comments were so disruptive, an uninvolved admin could have easily warned me first and asked me to do X or Y. This didnt happen. I'm trying to be brief and wish I had space to express myself. Respectfully. 2601:19E:427E:5BB0:34CA:87CE:F550:B1EE (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your posts are full of casting aspersions, assuming bad faith, and treating Wikipedia as a battleground. I think this block was correctly placed to prevent the disruption you have caused. 331dot (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.