2601:447:4080:10:912C:D93C:EE17:4A09

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Rubén Díaz Sr. and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 17:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Roman Catholic Diocese of El Paso, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is what I sourced, an archived Dallas Morning News article which is certainly not "defamatory" or an "unreliable source."[1].2601:447:4080:10:912C:D93C:EE17:4A09 (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. If you cannot tell the difference between the website of a newspaper and that of a partisan organization, you shouldn't be editing here. Please see my edit summary, where I have suggested what you can do. Drmies (talk) 20:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit summary is weak. You have yet to prove that Dallas Morning News did not let Bishop Accountability, which is a very reliable source of data collection and also mentioned as a source on the Catholic Church abuse cases article, use that article.2601:447:4080:10:F00B:7FB8:BA20:BBF1 (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Am waiting for a new generation propagandist to make up an excuse

The truth hurts about what the Minneapolis Charter Commission approved.[2]2601:447:4080:10:912C:D93C:EE17:4A09 (talk) 16:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

---