Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:447:4100:C120:DD6E:BDCD:E7FE:C9F7) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! MrClog (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jean Vanier, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't add redundant information. We don't need to discuss the removal of his awards under both reactions and awards. Meters (talk) 02:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm afraid you are only presenting yourself as someone with bias. The edit referring to the awards was in the proper "Awards and honours" section and the one in the "Reactions" section was quoting the University of Notre Dame President. The fact that you could also not entirely erase the edit also shows you knew that there was a bad case for doing so. If this reply does "make you" erase it, you're only proving the point further2601:447:4100:C120:DD6E:BDCD:E7FE:C9F7 (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I didn't want to remove all mention of it. It's useful content, but it does not belong in the awards section so I moved it. As for which version I kept, I do not believe that we need to keep a quote from the university's president giving his personal opinion about the L'Arche report. If you disagree then follow WP:BRD and take this to the article's talk page. Any more personal comments about me and I'll warn you for personal attacks. Meters (talk) 18:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply