2601:541:4500:1760:218:8BFF:FE74:FE4F

You're making lots of great contributions. Thank you very much. Perhaps you should consider registering an account. DrVogel (talk) 15:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:541:4500:1760:218:8BFF:FE74:FE4F) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 15:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Constantinople have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you

for fixing the Jaws (film) link at List of Top 40 songs from films. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Stop changing links

The links you are changing were fine before and do not need to be changed. Natureium (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

"Fixing" links

Hi, I wanted to let you know that "fixing" links is not only unnecessary, but it is actually discouraged. You can read more about it at WP:NOTBROKEN. Basically, it is ok to change the link if you are changing the target page, especially if you are disambiguating links. But if the link in question already redirects to the correct page, please do not "fix" it. Let me know if you have other questions about this. – Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 18:50, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please see other messages about changing the links. Read WP:NOTBROKEN for more. Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 00:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please see prior warnings about WP:NOTBROKEN Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 15:59, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Liston, New South Wales. Kerry (talk) 01:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HanotLo (talk) 13:33, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  caknuck _° needs to be running more often 21:34, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to University of National and World Economy, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. deadwikipedian (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop "fixing" links. They are WP:NOTBROKEN Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, per the messages above in #Stop changing links and #"Fixing" links, per WP:NOTBROKEN, use of a redirect is fine. In the example of your edits to Australian Army, it is more relevant to have Warrant Officer capitalized than to avoid the redirect. There is no gain in avoiding redirects and it would be better to make it an [[A|B]] redirect such as [[warrant officer|Warrant Officer]] rather than remove the capitalization as it is a title. — IVORK _Discuss 23:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Berbers. OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:53, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bettino Craxi. Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 22:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks!

Thank you for fixing the disambiguation link to mint in Tzatziki. Also, I'm not sure what the deal is with those two previous warrnings; in both cases you fixed the link so it contained the proper diacritics. Thanks for that, too! (Other editors, n.b.: fixing spelling error redirects is explicitly not covered by NOTBROKEN.) Cheers, Just plain Bill (talk) 16:33, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dictatorship. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DatGoodDude342 (talk) 13:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This warning is not justified. This edit fixed a dab link, giving it a specific relevant target. Just plain Bill (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Skete, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gut flora. Natureium (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Propionate. Stop changing links that are not broken Several people have informed you of this. Natureium (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Butyrate. Natureium (talk) 19:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chromium(III) chloride. Natureium (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please

Hi, there are quite a few people giving you warnings for disruptive editing. They are right to do so. However, some of the contributions you make are really useful. I don't want you to get banned... I just wanted to ask you, do you know the difference between useful and disruptive? Because if you can stop being disruptive but can continue with the useful edits, myself and many others would really appreciate your efforts and thank you for them. But if you carry on like this, you're going to get yourself blocked, and that'll be a shame for both you and Wikipedia. If you need help understanding the difference, give me a shout, I'm more than happy to help. Let me know. All the best, Dr. Vogel (talk) 22:56, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Canada Agricultural Products Act. You have been warned many times to stop fixing links that aren't broken. Stop. Natureium (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sodium cobalt oxide. Natureium (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is a difference between links that need to be disambiguated and links that are perfectly fine. Avoid changing links that don't need to be changed. Natureium (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---