Contesting prods

edit

Got reasons? Valfontis (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

To expand, many proposed deletions have no WP:RS references. Articles need significant coverage in at least two RS references independent of the article subject to clearly establish notability. Thanks for notifying the proposers about your removals of the prods, but unless you also plan to add reliable sources to these articles, most of these will go to afd and end up deleted.Dialectric (talk) 21:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Including the WP:BLP I prodded that has no WP:SECONDARY. Removing the prod on that without commenting why IMHO deserves your input at the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charis Katakis . Widefox; talk 22:47, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:6C6F:3B3D:9F18:9068. You have new messages at Randykitty's talk page.
Message added 22:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Randykitty (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hacker (sculptor)

edit

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hacker (sculptor). As you've deprodded several articles without reason, seems only fair to ask for why at the AfD of two of them. Other is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charis Katakis Thanks. Widefox; talk 23:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:ANI discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply