2604:3D09:6A85:6000:A462:F32B:6146:B268

January 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amy Schneider, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. snood1205 18:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Consider your vocabulary: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jan/2/media-ripped-crowning-trans-player-amy-schneider-t/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3d09:6a85:6000:a462:f32b:6146:b268 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Per the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources the Washington Times is The Washington Times is a marginally reliable source for politics and science. Most editors agree that it is a partisan source. Some editors noted a history of publishing inaccurate or false information, of being slow to issue retractions or corrections, and of sometimes only doing so under the threat of legal action; also with the important note The Washington Times should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially about living persons. This is both a political piece and has contentious information about a living person, which would not make it appropriate for wikipedia as a WP:RS. Regardless, the opinion of the Washington Times in an article does not override MOS:GID. Please abide by these guidelines; they were set in place for a reason with lots of discussion and consensus. snood1205 13:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

---