2605:8D80:541:667F:A8A2:A293:781B:F57F

March 2022

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that in this edit to Chinese government response to COVID-19, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 00:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Did you take the time to review edit history or talk page before reinserting contested additions?2605:8D80:541:667F:A8A2:A293:781B:F57F (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

• Yes, but the talk page section related to the edit had no indication of consensus. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 00:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Correct there is no consensus to add this. Been removed 6 times by 4 different editors.2605:8D80:541:667F:A8A2:A293:781B:F57F (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Chinese government response to COVID-19 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are welcome to voice your opinion constructively on RfC: Alleged under-counting of cases and deaths. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 00:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Still waiting on reply [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chinese

_government_response_to_COVID-19&action=edit&section=10]. Have you seen his history?

• First off, your link is broken. Second, I did reply to that. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 00:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

---