A recommendation

edit

I would suggest that you cease to try engaging people in argument about gender-critical feminism. In my experience, they are not going to change their minds, and the likely outcome is that you will be topic-banned from gender/sexuality. Wikipedia is not the place for these arguments, which should, instead, be made in the ‘real world’. As it says in WP:NOTFORUM : …bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article…. Best wishes. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, but I do oppose this nasty cruel Orwellian ideaology. Their article on that person in the rape centre in Scotland, ignored any of the allegations made against the person, and made the person seem like a victim, when they were comitting violations. Again here they are calling good people, hateful and nazis, when Dawkins and the like are good people. I sometimes imagine that really it is a Russian, Chinese, or Iranian spy op (Or maybe even US or British right wing), so right wingers there can say, well see liberalism and democracy means that you have too accept biological males as women, when it just does not, we can choose ourselves. Yes be tolerant to trans, but dont deny biological sex exists. 2A00:23C4:B3AD:8E01:7896:3C92:6D02:675B (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Gender-critical feminism. Thank you.

The exact thread is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#IP_editor_being_disruptive_on_talk_page LunaHasArrived (talk) 13:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

In case you do return, please do not remove other editors' comments from article talk pages. It's disruptive editing behavior. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply