Help me justify my reverting the deletion of a ref of findagrave that is used in many articles. SWP13 (talk) 22:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm not really sure why I should waste my time explaining it again to someone who has steadfastly refused to read the policy I've already cited, but here goes: FindAGrave has been discussed again and again and again and again and again and again and again at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Because it has already been discussed ad nauseam, it is now listed at WP:ELPEREN. As WP:ELPEREN states, FindAGrave is a self-published, user-generated website with no editorial control, is not vetted, and may contain photoshopped (i.e., altered) images. As such, it is not a reliable source. It may be listed in the External links section of an article because that section does not have the same constraints on reliability as those on sources 32.218.45.216 (talk) 22:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply