User talk:3family6/Archive 11

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 3family6 in topic Help with audio sample
Archive 5Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 15

Filmography vs. videography

A lot of people were unclear on the difference between the two and I belived the difference was the music videos, I just need so clarity for the future as to the real difference. Thank youPeachywink (talk) 06:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't include music videos. Those would be better in a discography list.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 06:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Actually that's not where they go. I think they are normally placed in videographies because I looked at lady gaga's, katy perry's and a few other to get an idea for what was normal for music artist to have in filmographies and for all the filmographie links to a videography that includes the MV and the discographies do not have them. Also about the english...I'm actually american but I'm dyslexic with a reading/writing learning disability so you can change it however you feel is appropriatePeachywink (talk) 06:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Okay, you are correct. You are following the Wikipedia consensus, though I personally, while I'm willing to accept this consensus, disagree with it slightly. No problem about the English - I myself, until about a year and a half ago, didn't know about the differences between British and American English when using collective nouns.

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Uniquark9 reported for edit warring

If you were interested.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:49, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Bumps Inf

Help me.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:45, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

2014-2015 GA Cup Wrap-Up

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Finals/Wrap-Up
 

The inaugural GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists.

The winner of the 2014/2015 GA Cup is Jaguar! He earned an impressive 615 points, despite only being a wildcard in the Round 4. The key to Jaguar's success seemed to be reviewing lots of articles as well as reviewer the oldest nominations; he reviewed 39 nominations in this round. Overall, the key to everyone's success was reviewing articles that had been in the queue for at least three months, which was true throughout the competition. In second place was Wizardman, with 241 points, and following close behind in third place was Good888, with 211 points. Congrats!

Although there were a couple of bumps along the way, the judges have thoroughly enjoyed managing this competition. We hope that the participants had fun as well. The GA Cup was a resounding success, and that's due to all of you. The judges sincerely thank each and every participant, and for the editors who were willing to subject their articles to this process. We learned a lot. For example, we learned that even with meticulous planning, it's impossible to anticipate every problem. We learned that the scoring system we set up wasn't always the most effective. The enthusiasm and motivation of Wikipedians is awesome, and we enjoyed watching what was sometimes fierce competition. We look forward to the second GA Cup later this year.

We reached many of our goals. See here for GA Cup statistics. We made a big difference, especially in shortening the length of time articles spend in the queue, and in reducing the backlog. Overall, 578 nominations were reviewed throughout the competition and a total of 8,184 points were awarded. Everyone involved should be very proud of what we've accomplished through the GA Cup. Stay tuned for more information about our next competition.

There will be some much-needed changes made in the scoring system next time. We appreciate your feedback, and commit to seriously consider it. If you haven't already, please fill out the feedback form here. If you're interested in being a judge in our second GA Cup, please let one of our judges know or click on the tab found in the feedback form.

Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners!

Cheers from Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup Barnstar

  Round 5 Barnstar for the GA Cup
You made it to the final round in the 2014-2015 GA Cup! Thank-you for being part of the success for the first GA Cup! We hope to see you next year!--Dom497 (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! And thank you also to all of the other judges and participants.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:09, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

RedCloud

His music is covered by AllMusic, Cross Rhythms, Jesus Freak Hideout, The Phantom Tollbooth, and Rapzilla. His music has not fared commercially well, as evidenced by no Billboard chartings. I have to ask, do you think he is notable for inclusion?The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Absolutely. This guy is solidly notable. Commercial success is not necessary for notability, it merely can indicate it. The coverage of the subject in multiple reliable, independent sources is the ultimate determiner of notability.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 05:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
It is now at RedCloud (rapper).The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
You can nominate it for DYK, if you feel like it meets the criteria.The Cross Bearer (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Richard III

Thank you very much for your help in getting Exhumation of Richard III of England to Featured Article status! I thought you might like to know that I have nominated it for Today's Featured Article for 26 March 2015. The request is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Exhumation of Richard III of England. Please feel free to comment if you have any views. Prioryman (talk) 09:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

DYK for RedCloud (rapper)

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

What a shame

According to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ancientsteppe/Archive, accounts including Toghuchar, Khorichar, Khiruge and Ceithe etc are all sock-puppets of Ancientsteppe. In fact, there are over 50 accounts that he had operated as listed in that page. What a shame. All these listed accounts have been blocked indefinitely. --Evecurid (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I discovered that myself earlier this evening. I suspected that something like that was going on, and, sadly, it turns out that I was right.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Invitation

 
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, 3family6,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

VisualEditor News #2—2015

 
Did you know?

With Citoid in VisualEditor, you click the 'book with bookmark' icon and paste in the URL for a reliable source:


 


Citoid looks up the source for you and returns the citation results. Click the green "Insert" button to accept its results and add them to the article:


 


After inserting the citation, you can change it. Select the reference, and click the "Edit" button in the context menu to make changes.


The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on VisualEditor's performance, the Citoid reference service, and support for languages with complex input requirements. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.

The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, each Wednesday at 11:00 (noon) PDT (18:00 UTC). You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q4 blocker. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the Editing team's Q4 blocker project with the bug. Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal.

Recent improvements

VisualEditor is now substantially faster. In many cases, opening the page in VisualEditor is now faster than opening it in the wikitext editor. The new system has improved the code speed by 37% and network speed by almost 40%.

The Editing team is slowly adding auto-fill features for citations. This is currently available only at the French, Italian, and English Wikipedias. The Citoid service takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. After creating it, you will be able to change or add information to the citation, in the same way that you edit any other pre-existing citation in VisualEditor. Support for ISBNs, PMIDs, and other identifiers is planned. Later, editors will be able to improve precision and reduce the need for manual corrections by contributing to the Citoid service's definitions for each website.

Citoid requires good TemplateData for your citation templates. If you would like to request this feature for your wiki, please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.

The special character inserter has been improved, based upon feedback from active users. After this, VisualEditor was made available to all users of Wikipedias on the Phase 5 list on 30 March. This affected 53 mid-size and smaller Wikipedias, including AfrikaansAzerbaijaniBretonKyrgyzMacedonianMongolianTatar, and Welsh.

Work continues to support languages with complex requirements, such as Korean and Japanese. These languages use input method editors ("IMEs”). Recent improvements to cursoring, backspace, and delete behavior will simplify typing in VisualEditor for these users.

The design for the image selection process is now using a "masonry fit" model. Images in the search results are displayed at the same height but at variable widths, similar to bricks of different sizes in a masonry wall, or the "packed" mode in image galleries. This style helps you find the right image by making it easier to see more details in images.

You can now drag and drop categories to re-arrange their order of appearance ​on the page.

The pop-up window that appears when you click on a reference, image, link, or other element, is called the "context menu". It now displays additional useful information, such as the destination of the link or the image's filename. The team has also added an explicit "Edit" button in the context menu, which helps new editors open the tool to change the item.

Invisible templates are marked by a puzzle piece icon so they can be interacted with. Users also will be able to see and edit HTML anchors now in section headings.

Users of the TemplateData GUI editor can now set a string as an optional text for the 'deprecated' property in addition to boolean value, which lets you tell users of the template what they should do instead (T90734).

Looking ahead

The special character inserter in VisualEditor will soon use the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki will also have the option of creating a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Instructions for customizing the list will be posted at mediawiki.org.

The team is discussing a test of VisualEditor with new users, to see whether they have met their goals of making VisualEditor suitable for those editors. The timing is unknown, but might be relatively soon.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • Can you translate from English into any other language? Please check this list to see whether more interface translations are needed for your language. Contact us to get an account if you want to help!
  • The design research team wants to see how real editors work. Please sign up for their research program.
  • File requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the character formatting menu in Phabricator.

Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

-Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 17:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lecrae

The article Lecrae you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Lecrae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Jacedc (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omen (Antestor album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Forsaken and Martyrium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

  Hello! Your submission of List of awards received by Lecrae at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cowlibob (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Boat Race reviews

  The Running Man Barnstar
Hey 3family6, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the reviews of Boat Race articles you've conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome! It was a pleasure reviewing them. I think that this is really close to being a featured topic, if the main Boat Race article were improved to GA.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 22:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

Comment

I think you posted your comment on the wrong talk page.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

No, I was directly responding to TheLongTone's comments there. In doing so, though, I also referred to their objections that they voiced in an edit summary on How Can It Be.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
I think that I irked him somewhat with Aunt Jemima on his user talk page.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Was that comment meant to be sarcastic? If not, it certainly came across that way. If so, I personally think that was very abrasive, and I would apologize. I was thinking of some sarcastic comments (in reference to the "niche" argument) to make myself, but I felt that it wouldn't be very Christ-like to do that.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
It was sarcasm, but Christians have to be cautious when utilizing that device, which I went to the users page to apologize for my error in judgment.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
This is a lesson I've been learning, too. I have a sarcastic, sometimes caustic sense of humor, and I sometimes use it in a passive aggressive manner, which I should not do.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 05:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards received by Lecrae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AXS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

Satanic Warmaster

The lyrical themes section was poorly sourced. That is simply enough to remove the material in a BLP. Get more sources. Get the best sources you can find.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 03:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

I think I'll just leave the article alone. I don't care enough about it to spend the energy. Hopefully someone with more interest will take up the task.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 05:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of awards received by Lecrae

Harrias talk 19:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viking metal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Regis and Holy Blood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

As I Lay Dying/American Tragedy

Just thought I'd let you know, User:Walter Görlitz left a message on my talk page explaining his reasoning behind the AILD revert. I thought his arguments made sense.--MASHAUNIX 16:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks @Mashaunix:. I also raised it at the template and so far only one editor commented there and agreed that a split wouldn't qualify as collaborating on an album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup email

 
Hello, 3family6. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 01:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lecrae

Harrias talk 20:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

Notification

See Vertical Church Band deletion discussion.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Peace pipe offering

Hey, thanks. No hard feelings about the deletion discussion. I don't take it personally, and I hope you don't either.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
No, I just want to become the best Wikipedia editor that I can become, and you helped me see the light, with regards to the article in question.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I've learned so much myself since I started on here, and I'm still learning a lot.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 13:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

2015 GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup
 

Greetings, all!

We would like to announce the start of the 2nd GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Our inaugural competition, which ran from October 2014 to April 2015, was such a resounding success that we'd like to do it again. Currently, there are over 500 GANs ready to be reviewed; competitors in the previous GA Cup reviewed about 570 GAs, so we can again make a huge impact in helping editors improve articles in Wikipedia and decrease the traditionally long queue at GAN.

The 2nd GA Cup will begin on July 1, 2015. As last time, five rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on November 28, 2015), but this may change based on participant numbers. The judges learned a lot during the 1st GA Cup which exposed weaknesses in its system. Using both the feedback from last year's participants and the weaknesses discovered, we've revised the scoring system to make it more fair. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same.

We also are introducing three new judges: 3family6, Jaguar and MrWooHoo. So in total, there will be six judges. We hope this will allow the competition to run more smoothly.

Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on July 15, 2015. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.

Cheers from 3family6, Dom497, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo, and TheQ Editor.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Omen (Antestor album)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Add to metalcore

Please, I want you to add these on that list, for me thank you.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Let's just wait till Synthwave.94 is done with the article, then you can go ahead and add them yourself. That's the only reason I reverted you, because the article is under construction.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay, it's fine.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 June

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

VisualEditor News #3—2015

 
Did you know?

When you click on a link to an article, you now see more information:

 


The link tool has been re-designed:

 


There are separate tabs for linking to internal and external pages.

The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has created new interfaces for the link and citation tools, as well as fixing many bugs and changing some elements of the design. Some of these bugs affected users of VisualEditor on mobile devices. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.

A test of VisualEditor's effect on new editors at the English Wikipedia has just completed the first phase. During this test, half of newly registered editors had VisualEditor automatically enabled, and half did not. The main goal of the study is to learn which group was more likely to save an edit and to make productive, unreverted edits. Initial results will be posted at Meta later this month.

Recent improvements

Auto-fill features for citations are available at a few Wikipedias through the citoid service. Citoid takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. If Citoid is enabled on your wiki, then the design of the citation workflow changed during May. All citations are now created inside a single tool. Inside that tool, choose the tab you want (⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-auto⧽, ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-manual⧽, or ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-reuse⧽). The cite button is now labeled with the word "⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽" rather than a book icon, and the autofill citation dialog now has a more meaningful label, "⧼Citoid-citeFromIDDialog-lookup-button⧽", for the submit button.

The link tool has been redesigned based on feedback from Wikipedia editors and user testing. It now has two separate sections: one for links to articles and one for external links. When you select a link, its pop-up context menu shows the name of the linked page, a thumbnail image from the linked page, Wikidata's description, and/or appropriate icons for disambiguation pages, redirect pages and empty pages. Search results have been reduced to the first five pages. Several bugs were fixed, including a dark highlight that appeared over the first match in the link inspector (T98085).  

The special character inserter in VisualEditor now uses the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki can also create a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Please read the instructions for customizing the list at mediawiki.org. Also, there is now a tooltip to describing each character in the special character inserter (T70425).

Several improvements have been made to templates. When you search for a template to insert, the list of results now contains descriptions of the templates. The parameter list inside the template dialog now remains open after inserting a parameter from the list, so that users don’t need to click on "⧼visualeditor-dialog-transclusion-add-param⧽" each time they want to add another parameter (T95696). The team added a new property for TemplateData, "Example", for template parameters. This optional, translatable property will show up when there is text describing how to use that parameter (T53049).

The design of the main toolbar and several other elements have changed slightly, to be consistent with the MediaWiki theme. In the Vector skin, individual items in the menu are separated visually by pale gray bars. Buttons and menus on the toolbar can now contain both an icon and a text label, rather than just one or the other. This new design feature is being used for the cite button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled.

The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent image is linked in an article, then it is now visible in VisualEditor and can be selected, edited, replaced, or removed.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, each Wednesday at 12:00 (noon) PDT (19:00 UTC). Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q4 blocker. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the Editing team's Q4 blocker project with the bug.
  • If your Wikivoyage, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, or other community wants to have VisualEditor made available by default to contributors, then please contact James Forrester.
  • If you would like to request the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki, please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.

Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

A Hill to Die Upon

It has not been moved fully over to article mainspace, User:3family6/A Hill to Die Upon, where others can edit the article.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Because I don't think it's ready for mainspace. I was planning to have it done at this point, but the Christian metal list fiasco has pushed that back. You can edit the article if you want, user space is not restricted to just the user.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Help with audio sample

Hey dude, can you upload Metallica - The Four Horsemen.ogg from the YouTube link (5:14—5:41). Thanks a bunch.--Retrohead (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

@Retrohead: How is it being discussed in Kill 'Em All? I need some type of rationale for uploading it. I've got the converted MP3 and Audacity and everything, but right now I don't see how a clip from that particular section will be discussed in the article.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
The explanation is in the hidden window at the article: The Four Horsemen" is based on a galloping tremolo picked riff and double bass drum triplets. Its multipart concept preceded the more complex song structures Metallica applied on subsequent albums.--Retrohead (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Done.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)