47.201.179.7

Polio vaccine

Please do some more research to establish if the Pasteur Institute vaccine was produced or used. I agree that discovery should be mentioned in the article, but if it was not produced on a large scale it should not merit prominent mention in the article lead. In the meantime please do not edit-war to move it up in the article. Acroterion (talk) 03:55, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

France maintained a vaccination program using Lepine's vaccine.

OK, then you should be able to establish sourcing on that and give it some context. If the Lepine vaccine was the basis of France's program it should be expanded. Was it used in French overseas territories? Was it used in preference to the Salk vaccine elsewhere? Acroterion (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

source http://webext.pasteur.fr/archives/e_lep0.html

See my comments at the article talkpage, and take a look at the French article on the subject, which gives Salk precedence but mentions Sabin and Lepine together. The sources there might be valuable and it might clear up the chronology. Acroterion (talk) 04:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I will fix the French Wikipedia.

No. You need to do the homework and find the detailed sources, not make the encyclopedia fit your views. Acroterion (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I have produced two excellent sources. Plenty.

You've produced two sources that give a direction for further research, since they don't provide details on exactly when and how and they don't support your "first" thesis. There's more work to do. Do you read French? The sources on frwiki for Lepine and the vaccine article would be a start. Acroterion (talk) 12:36, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

The dates and details are fully included in the two sources.

November 2016

Your recent editing history at Polio vaccine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Acroterion (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

We think you're on to a useful addition to the article, but you're hurting the cause by edit-warring over its prominence, and you appear to be confused about the difference between announcement of a vaccine and its use. The Salk vaccine's announcement clearly predates Lepine's, which is more contemporaneous with the Sabin vaccine. Salk was on the radio discussing the first vaccine in 1953. Acroterion (talk) 18:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Came into use 20 million doses. https://books.google.com/books?id=iKidtL80imMC&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=pierre+lepine+polio&source=bl&ots=yLfOrmqZQ-&sig=Jb8FAVuKoWoFVmspQroxxVJPiSQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjX6ayShszQAhUJbSYKHVGjA_oQ6AEIUDAL#v=onepage&q=pierre%20lepine%20polio&f=false

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 47.201.179.7. You have new messages at Talk:Twin paradox.
Message added 14:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CopernicusAD ^(u) (t) :) 14:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Twin paradox

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! TushiTalk To Me 15:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Vanna White. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 11:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Vanna White.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AldezD (talk) 14:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---