October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to David Lane (white supremacist), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 03:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring notice

edit

It is well-sourced that Lane drove the getaway car. I doubt that being a "getaway car driver" is a crime. He was convicted for conspiricy, racketeering, and others. Disagree? Discuss it on talk: David Lane (white supremacist)

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Lane (white supremacist). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

FYI: when you edit-war, you will likely find people get fatigued with it and stop listening. Jim1138 (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Lane (white supremacist). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 20:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at David Lane (white supremacist).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 20:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at David Lane (white supremacist). SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 20:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:49.2.134.195 reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ). Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as done at David Lane (white supremacist).
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.