User talk:4 Stars/Archive index2011/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:4 Stars. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
No Line on the Horizon
Hi there, I've reverted the edit you made to No Line on the Horizon which upped the number of units sold from five to six million. If you update sales figures then you need to be sure to update the source as well so that you can verify what is being said. Otherwise it constitutes original research. Cheers, Melicans (talk, contributions) 00:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Steve Jobs, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. YuMaNuMa (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this upload and this edit, they're both vandalism and are patently unconstructive. Please don't do that again. Regards, –MuZemike 06:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, won't vandalise again. ★★★★ 15:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Peer Review
I saw with this edit that you are growing impatient with the article's PR not being reviewed. Can you stop updating how the big the article is and how old the review is without a review? It makes you sound desperate and it would draw people away from reviewing and taking you seriously. GamerPro64 21:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- This edit indicates the article recieved no response from any users other than me within four days or so. Notice here, I'm waiting to recieve comments from a user in the Knuckles' Chaotix peer review, but what you see at the top of WP:PR is a list of four-day-old unreviewed PRs. Somewhat in articulation, my user page has a note stating that the PR was created on October 1, 2011. I'll revert that edit in the PR of that article myself. ★★★★ 21:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Now that I removed the updates, those edits were reverted. 21:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Also, just in my opinion, the article looks good to be a Good Article. It looks great from a newcomer to Wikipedia. GamerPro64 22:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Now that I removed the updates, those edits were reverted. 21:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)