August 2024

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Florian Haită have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Florian Haită was changed by 5.12.228.131 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945675 on 2024-08-30T22:20:46+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Louis Munteanu, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. 8Dodo8 has already explained this before here. ~ Tails Wx 20:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2024

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Xian Emmers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Xian Emmers. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You literally have no football knowledge like mine. Please accept the fact that you are misinformed, blind, sensitive, just like the others, and move on. Do you have any idea how hard it is for me to get some relevant info?! Think before you embarrass yourself. Have a good night! ;) 5.12.228.131 (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Dl2000:: This user has also insulted another member while editing the Florian Haita article. Users try to make him understand that he uses a website that is not considered a reliable source and he add incorrect information to infoboxes, leading to edit warring.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 11:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You guys completely think like sheep. Don't try to tell me what I've already known and understood! Think about it. 5.12.228.131 (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your comments towards other editors are unacceptable, as is your continued reintroduction of challenged material without providing reliable sources. You are expected to resolve your differences with other editors through civil discussion, not edit warring and name calling. If this behaviour continues in a weeks time, expect to be blocked again for a fair bit longer. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You will be forever damned by God for this cowardliness, I can guarantee you that. 5.12.228.131 (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
You guys have treated me poorly for no reason. Don't you accept the fact that you misjudged me and minimalized my edit work? I am here to repair, not vandalise. 5.12.228.131 (talk) 22:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Ponyobons mots 22:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply