November 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Touchdown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 12:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:06, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

May 2013

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Parker with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 71.114.52.94 (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Phạm because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Phạm has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phạm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 10:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Phạm, you may be blocked from editing. K6ka (talk | contribs) 12:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Phạm has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phạm with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~NottNott ( -) 12:34, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Antitheism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Antitheism was changed by 5.56.146.200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972142 on 2017-03-08T10:12:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Peter Fox (musician), but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 06:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Sukhoi Su-34 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 08:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.